# Artillery Load testing. Source: [Console review]() Website: [https://www.artillery.io]() Profile updated: 2026-10-16 Category: [Benchmarking / Load testing]() ## Supported tech stack Research checked: 2026-10-11 ### Integrates with - Docker (Integration) - GitHub Actions (Integration) - OpenTelemetry (Integration) - Playwright (Integration) Source: [Research source]() Documented compatibility; coverage may be incomplete. Written in describes implementation, not user-project language support. Official documentation lists Playwright engines, Docker usage, GitHub Actions and OpenTelemetry integrations. ## Console’s review — 2023-04-06 Reviewed: 2023-04-06 Author: [David Mytton]() Citation: [This review]() ### What we like Supports load testing and functional (assert) testing of APIs, message brokers, ecommerce systems, etc. Supports HTTP, WebSockets, Socket.io, HLS, file uploads, and other protocols via plugins. Reports p50, p95, p99, min and max. CI/CD runners to conduct continuous testing. Test scenarios written in code. Open source + cloud platform for distributed tests. ### Tradeoffs Can integrate with Playwright for headless browser testing, but this is experimental and the primary use case is backend testing. This review reflects Console’s assessment at publication on 2023-04-06. Features and limitations may have changed since the review date. ## Is Artillery a fit? Based on [Console’s review published on 2023-04-06](). Summary updated: 2026-10-16 ### Who it’s for Developers of APIs, message brokers, ecommerce systems, etc. should consider Artillery for load testing ### Why consider it Artillery supports load testing and functional testing of various systems via multiple protocols ### Keep in mind The headless browser testing feature is experimental [Selection criteria]() · [About Console]() · [Browse tools]()