# SeaweedFS Distributed object storage. Source: [Console review]() Website: [https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs]() Profile updated: 2026-10-16 Category: [Cloud storage]() ## Supported tech stack Research checked: 2026-10-11 ### Integrates with - Docker (Integration) - Helm (Integration) - Kubernetes (Integration) - S3 (Integration) Source: [Research source]() Documented compatibility; coverage may be incomplete. Written in describes implementation, not user-project language support. Object/file store exposes S3-compatible storage and provides Docker, Kubernetes and Helm deployment. ## Console’s review — 2023-06-08 Reviewed: 2023-06-08 Author: [David Mytton]() Citation: [This review]() ### What we like Easy to store, retrieve, and serve objects. Replication strategy can be defined when storing an object. Efficient for lots of small objects. Supports tiered storage in the cloud. Optionally supports directories, TTLs, mounting FUSE drives. You can use the API to serve objects publicly. Static (Go) binary. ### Tradeoffs Using it more than a key/value like object store requires a separate component which uses a database to persist metadata - this can be in-memory (but no persistence) or supports various datastores - but is an extra layer to manage. This review reflects Console’s assessment at publication on 2023-06-08. Features and limitations may have changed since the review date. ## Is SeaweedFS a fit? Based on [Console’s review published on 2023-06-08](). Summary updated: 2026-10-16 ### Who it’s for Developers needing distributed object storage ### Why consider it It is easy to store, retrieve, and serve objects ### Keep in mind It requires a separate component for metadata management beyond key/value storage [Selection criteria]() · [About Console]() · [Browse tools]()