A search engine optimized for performance and ease of use.
What is Typesense? Why did you build it?
Typesense is a search engine that's optimized for performance and ease of use, that you’d use to build search-as-you-type experiences.
With Typesense we're trying to essentially build an open source search engine like Elasticsearch or Solr, but with “out-of-box-ness” in mind - sane defaults, intuitive APIs and simpler configurations and low operational overhead. Currently, to implement site or app search using one of these services you have to wade through thousands of configuration parameters to implement what you’re looking to do. Typesense simplifies things so that out of the box, as you enter every key press, it starts returning results right away.
Typesense stores the entire index in memory, unlike Elasticsearch or Solr, which makes it super fast. We typically try to serve results in less than 50 milliseconds. The speed is of course a function of the size of your dataset, but I've been able to get sub-50 millisecond searches for as many as 10 million documents in an index. We're trying to make it easy for everyone to have access to search-as-you-type experiences, which I would say Algolia has done a fantastic job of. Many folks now understand the power of instant search, thanks to Algolia, but it is a proprietary platform, and very expensive at even moderate scale.
We're trying to democratize that Algolia-like search-as-you-type experience, so anyone can get up and running really fast, all the way from your development machine to production. We've also tried to simplify the ops overhead involved in deploying a search cluster. With Elasticsearch, you have to tweak the JVM, and there's lots of things that you have to get it to do to make it production grade. We're trying to solve that piece as well.
Did it start as an open-source project?
We started as an open source project. When we started in 2015, it was a nights and weekends project. We open sourced it in 2018, until then we were just trying to see if this is even a thing that could work. It was born out of our own pain with setting up an Elasticsearch cluster. We thought: "What would it take to build our own search engine?" It was kind of naive at the time. It turns out it takes a lot of work, which is why there are not many people doing this around the world, but I'm glad we stuck to it!
In 2020 we started working on the commercial aspects. It's interesting that it actually came out of users asking us for a hosted version of the product. In September 2020 we launched Typesense Cloud. We still run the same open source product in Typesense Cloud, but we've built a lot of automation and tooling around being able to provision clusters, and around self-healing. If anything happens, we are able to detect that automatically, and then the infrastructure self-heals, and has mitigative actions in place.
We've had strong interest, and it seems that Algolia has continued to raise their prices in the meantime, so we're on a nice collision path with Algolia! In January 2020, before we had even started the commercial version, we did a Hacker News post saying this is an open source alternative to Algolia, which seemed to resonate well with the community. We got almost 440 points and were on the front page for 24 hours. That was fun, and felt very validating.
What's the logic behind writing it in C++ and distributing as a single compiled binary?
The C++ ecosystem is very mature at this point as people have been running C++ code in production at scale for a long time. This means we’ve been able to use community-released libraries that have been used at large scale. The core search algorithms are custom built but for things like the HTTP library we use an open source project called H2O. This is run by Fastly on their production edge nodes, so it’s proven.
We also use a clustering library called Braft, that's run by Baidu in production. We’re able to take advantage of the mature ecosystem around C++, and it's saved us a lot of time.
I’ve been a fan of the way GoLang compiles code down to a single binary. It makes deployments just a matter of running that binary in production. Contrast that with something like Elasticsearch where you have to install not just Elasticsearch, but also the JVM and then some more to get it to run anywhere. Given that our goal is to minimize operational overhead, we drew inspiration from our past experiences and decided to ship Typesense as a single binary with no external dependencies. It makes things so much more easier.
What does a "day in the life" look like for you?
Of course there's the desired ‘day in the life of’, and there's an ‘actual day in the life of’, what I’m explaining is the actual ‘day in the life of’! I start the day with my co-founder, Kishore and I chatting about what happened the previous day. We live in different time zones with almost a ten hour difference, so this is typically doing a handoff: Did we see any production issues? Sharing what we've been working on or helping test each other's work, talk about architecture etc.
After that I typically look at our support channels on GitHub, email, or Slack, and see if anyone's asked any questions, then reply to them. It typically takes me three hours to clear messages, then after lunch is when my focus time starts. Whatever project is at hand I spend at least four to five hours of focused time on that.
By that time one of us has started the next day. We connect again and talk about what happened. Usually after dinner, I find time for an hour or two for more focused work. I try to isolate my meetings in the afternoon for a two hour block. If someone wants to chat about Typesense, or live support.
My desired schedule would be to have some physical activity somewhere in there too. Some exercise, or maybe I’d go out on a walk. Take some time to think about things without sitting in front of a computer. I'm slowly starting to consciously unplug from sitting in front of a computer, and a keyboard, and spend time just thinking about things rather than always sitting in front of the computer.
And the two of you run the project?
Yep. It's just the two of us.
Our goal is to democratize access to good instant-search technology and we could use all the help we can get. So if there’s anyone using different web/app frameworks and would like to use Typesense with it, we’d love to partner to build an integration.
Similarly, we need more client libraries. We recently got asked for a Rust client library. The community has built like a Google client, a PHP client, and a .Net client. Java is probably our next biggest thing, so if anyone has production level experience in these, then we’d value getting help from the community around client libraries.
How did you first get into software development
I started programming when I was 11 years old. My dad is a software engineer, and he taught me the basics of C. We went from nothing to parsing command line arguments with C in the first week. That was one of my first memories of learning programming. I learned a little bit of Java in high school, then I discovered Visual Basic. That was fantastic for me, because it had a GUI, so you can point, and click, and build the interfaces. It also had great documentation which helped pick things up quickly.
Next I discovered web development. PHP was my first web language. I then picked up Erlang and Node. These days my go-to coding language is Ruby.
What has been the most interesting development challenge building Typesense?
I've been a back-end engineer for the majority of my career. Slowly over time, I also started picking up an interest in visual, and UI design. It’s very interesting implementing designs and using modern frontend tooling. The most interesting thing is working on UI such as the landing pages for Typesense, mainly because I get to wear the hat of both a designer and a developer.
My approach is that I won't start developing until I finish designing, which is a challenge as an engineer, as you're itching to start developing. Along with that, I also picked up Vue, Nuxt, single page apps, and the Statically Generated Site ecosystem. That was super fun. The more challenging part was to say, I'm not going to start working on the tech until I finish thinking through the end-to-end user experience. Learning the design world and how making something look good and function well is actually not as simple as I thought. It takes a lot of work and has been an interesting challenge.
In the Typesense core itself, I would say a challenge is maintaining the core performance. Every little code change we do, even if it introduces a millisecond of slowdown, will stop it from working as search-as-you-type. Keeping a very close eye and benchmarking things with every little change has been a nice challenge.
We’re currently using k6 locally but I am planning to automate it now so that every change automatically runs performance benchmarks in our CI environment. That's going to be an interesting thing to set up, because you can't just use something like CircleCI to throw a bunch of traffic. We’re probably going to have to set up our own performance testing environment with every build. I'm looking forward to that.
What is the most interesting tech you are playing around with at the moment?
k6 is another project that I regularly use. I now use it exclusively for load testing, after having used ab, Siege and JMeter in the past.
I feel anything that makes the development experience easy seems to be catching on. Even if it's technology that's been around forever, like load testing is not a new thing, but k6 makes it easier.
This is what we're doing for search with Typesense. Search has been around forever, we are simplifying it, and making it super easy to use, so it's one less thing on your plate. Other examples are Netlify and Cloudflare Pages.
Anything that simplifies a developer's life is a net positive.
Describe your computer hardware setup
I use a Macbook Pro (16 gigabyte RAM machine with a one terabyte SSD) with an external 27" Dell monitor with the Apple keyboard. I still use the 2015 version and haven't found the heart to upgrade after the old keyboard fiasco. I’m wondering if I should consider switching to a Mac Mini for my next upgrade.
Describe your computer software setup
OS: macOS Mojave.
Email: Gmail. For support emails I use HelpScout which is like a ticketing system, and it has built in chat and a knowledge base.
Chat: Slack and WhatsApp.
IDE: I'm a big fan of the JetBrains ecosystem. So I use RubyMine, WebStorm, PhpStorm, Pycharm, CLion, and IntelliJ
Source control: Git and GitHub.
Describe your desk setup
My setup is a home office + home studio. I work from a standard corner desk, and have some soundproofing material and a camera. I just started setting up a better camera. I learned from someone else that you can actually use DSLRs, and set them up as a webcam so I just started playing around with it. My video quality should increase dramatically.
Daytime or nighttime? Night time.
Tea or coffee? Neither.
Silence or music? Music if I need focus to avoid distractions.
What non-tech activities do you like to do?
I play the keyboard and my wife sings. Every now, and then when we find time, we record things, that's my main creative outlet. Otherwise, I enjoy watching shows and movies. I generally discover shows past their hype season. I recently finished watching Homeland which was wonderful.
Find out more
Typesense is a search engine optimized for performance and ease of use. It was featured as an "Interesting Tool" in the Console newsletter on 8 Apr 2021. This interview was conducted on 29 Mar 2021.
Subscribe to the weekly Console newsletter
An email digest of the best tools and beta releases for developers. Every Thursday. See the latest email